Loading...
In 2018, England and Croatia produced one of the great World Cup semi-finals — a match that ended 2-1 in extra time, sent Croatia to their first final, and left English fans staring at what might have been. Eight years later, Group L reunites them at the group stage, and the narrative practically writes itself. But a good story is not the same as a good bet. I have run the numbers on World Cup 2026 Group L extensively, and what the data reveals is a group where the top two are almost predetermined, the real battle is for third place, and the value lies in the margins between Ghana and Panama rather than in the England-Croatia headline.
England vs Croatia: A Rivalry Measured in Tournament Scars
The 2018 semi-final is the headline, but it is not the only data point. England and Croatia have met in consequential tournament fixtures repeatedly: Croatia eliminated England from Euro 2008 qualifying with a 3-2 win at Wembley, one of the most devastating results in English football history. The emotional scar tissue from these encounters is real, and it matters in tournament contexts where mentality is as important as tactics.
England’s squad in 2026 is arguably the most talented they have produced since the 2006 generation of Gerrard, Lampard, and Rooney. Jude Bellingham has established himself as one of the three best midfielders on the planet. Bukayo Saka’s output — 14 goals and 11 assists in his most recent Premier League season — makes him a genuine Ballon d’Or contender. Phil Foden, Cole Palmer, Declan Rice — the depth is extraordinary. England reached the Euro 2024 final and the Euro 2021 final before that. Two consecutive major tournament finals without lifting a trophy is both impressive and agonising, and it creates a narrative pressure that hangs over this squad like the 58-year weight of 1966.
Croatia, by contrast, are in transition. The Modric-Brozovic-Perisic spine that carried them to the 2018 final and the 2022 semi-final is ageing out. Luka Modric will be 40 during the tournament — an extraordinary age for an outfield player at a World Cup, and one that raises legitimate questions about his ability to influence three group-stage matches in the space of twelve days. Croatia’s qualifying campaign relied increasingly on younger talent like Josko Gvardiol and Lovro Majer, but the question is whether this new generation can replicate the tournament mentality that defined the 2018 squad. Croatian football has a remarkable ability to produce generations of world-class midfielders, and the pipeline from Dinamo Zagreb’s academy continues to deliver, but the next wave has not yet been tested at the sharp end of a World Cup. I rate England at 62% to win the head-to-head, Croatia at 18%, draw at 20%. Those are wide margins, and they reflect a genuine quality gap that has widened since 2018.
Team Profiles: Group L by the Numbers
The statistical gap between Group L’s top half and bottom half is among the most pronounced in the draw. Here is the data I have compiled.
| Team | FIFA Ranking | Confederation | WC Appearances | Group Winner Odds | Qualification Odds | Key Player |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 4 | UEFA | 17th | 1.35 | 1.08 | Jude Bellingham |
| Croatia | 12 | UEFA | 7th | 3.50 | 1.55 | Luka Modric |
| Ghana | 48 | CAF | 5th | 12.00 | 5.00 | Mohammed Kudus |
| Panama | 52 | CONCACAF | 3rd | 26.00 | 9.00 | Jose Fajardo |
England at 4th in the world and Croatia at 12th create a UEFA double-header at the top of this group that the lower-seeded sides will struggle to disrupt. Ghana’s ranking of 48th understates their quality — Mohammed Kudus has become one of the Premier League’s most exciting attacking midfielders, and the Black Stars’ CAF qualification campaign demonstrated a squad with genuine pace and technical ability in forward areas. Ghana’s World Cup pedigree is underrated: they reached the quarter-finals in 2010 (denied a semi-final by Luis Suarez’s infamous handball), beat the USA in 2006, and have never been eliminated from a group without winning at least one match. That fighting quality makes them dangerous third seeds.
Panama, at 52nd, return to the World Cup for the third time after their debut in 2018 and qualified through a competitive CONCACAF campaign that required results against the USA and Mexico. They are the group’s clear underdog, but their compact defensive structure and set-piece threat make them capable of taking points off distracted opponents. Panama’s average squad age is among the lowest in the tournament, which brings energy and fearlessness — young players with nothing to lose tend to perform above their ranking in one-off fixtures. Their 2018 debut campaign yielded no points and a 6-1 loss to England, but the squad has matured considerably since then, and the coaching staff have built a system rather than relying on individual moments.
The two-UEFA-team dynamic is worth flagging for punters. In World Cup groups containing two UEFA sides, those teams have historically shared the top two positions 71% of the time since 1998. The draw format typically separates UEFA teams across groups, but the expanded 48-team structure makes double-ups inevitable, and Group L follows the historical pattern almost exactly. England and Croatia are priced to advance together, and the data supports that expectation.
Fixtures and NZT Schedule
Group L’s fixtures are concentrated on the US East Coast, which means slightly less friendly viewing times for New Zealand compared to the west-coast Group G fixtures, but still manageable.
| Date (ET) | Date (NZT) | Match | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun, 18:00 | 18 Jun, 10:00 | England vs Ghana | Hard Rock Stadium, Miami |
| 17 Jun, 21:00 | 18 Jun, 13:00 | Croatia vs Panama | Gillette Stadium, Boston |
| 22 Jun, 18:00 | 23 Jun, 10:00 | England vs Croatia | MetLife Stadium, East Rutherford |
| 22 Jun, 21:00 | 23 Jun, 13:00 | Ghana vs Panama | Hard Rock Stadium, Miami |
| 27 Jun, 21:00 | 28 Jun, 13:00 | England vs Panama | Gillette Stadium, Boston |
| 27 Jun, 21:00 | 28 Jun, 13:00 | Croatia vs Ghana | MetLife Stadium, East Rutherford |
The marquee fixture — England vs Croatia on matchday two — takes place at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. That is the same venue hosting the World Cup final on 19 July, which adds a layer of occasion to an already emotionally charged rematch. For Kiwi viewers, it kicks off at 10:00 NZT on 23 June — a Monday morning appointment that is early but not unreasonable for a match of this magnitude.
Match Analysis: Where the Decisive Points Will Be Won
Group L’s outcome depends less on the England-Croatia match than you might think. I expect both to qualify regardless of that result. The decisive matches are the ones involving Ghana and Panama — specifically, how many points those two sides take off the favourites.
England vs Ghana — Matchday 1
England should win comfortably, but Ghana have a record of upsetting European sides at World Cups. They beat the USA 2-1 in 2014, drew with Germany 2-2 in 2014, and beat South Korea 2-0 in 2006. Kudus, who averaged over four dribbles per match in the Premier League this season, is exactly the kind of individual talent that can unlock tight matches. I give England a 70% win probability, but Ghana at 12% for a win and 18% for a draw means there is a live upset chance — roughly one in three that England drop points. For punters, the Ghana +1.5 goals Asian handicap line is where I see the best value in this fixture.
Croatia vs Ghana — Matchday 3
This is the match I have identified as the group’s pivot. If Croatia have already secured qualification after matchday two, they may rotate their squad against Ghana — particularly to rest ageing legs ahead of the knockout stage. A second-string Croatia side is still strong, but Ghana’s pace in transition and Kudus’s ability to create something from nothing could exploit a less cohesive defensive unit. I model this at 48% Croatia, 25% Ghana, 27% draw. If Ghana win, they finish on four to six points and have a genuine shot at a best-third qualification — a scenario that the market’s 5.00 qualification odds (implied 20%) dramatically underprices if my model is right at 32%.
Ghana vs Panama — Matchday 2
The match that determines third place in most of my simulations. Ghana’s individual quality should tell, but Panama’s defensive discipline in CONCACAF qualifying — they conceded fewer goals than the USA — makes this a tighter fixture than the rankings suggest. A draw suits neither side if they are chasing points, which means we should see an open, attacking contest. The Miami heat at Hard Rock Stadium adds a physical dimension: both teams are accustomed to warm conditions, but the humidity in south Florida in June is punishing even by tropical standards, and the side with superior fitness and squad depth will benefit in the final twenty minutes. Ghana’s pace advantage on the flanks should be decisive if they can sustain their pressing intensity. I model Ghana at 45% win probability, Panama at 24%, draw at 31%.
Qualification Data and Predicted Standings
Running Group L through my simulation model produces clean, predictable outputs — which is unusual. Most groups have one or two positions that flip regularly across iterations. Group L’s top two are remarkably stable.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Top 2 | Inc. Best 3rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 68% | 23% | 7% | 2% | 91% | 96% |
| Croatia | 22% | 47% | 22% | 9% | 69% | 82% |
| Ghana | 8% | 22% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 52% |
| Panama | 2% | 8% | 31% | 59% | 10% | 24% |
England’s 91% top-two probability is the highest in any group in my entire 48-team model. Their qualification at 1.08 offers no betting value whatsoever — you are tying up capital for minimal return. Croatia at 1.55 is similarly uninspiring from a value perspective, though a Croatia group-winner bet at 3.50 offers marginal interest if you believe they can beat England on matchday two.
The value in Group L sits with Ghana. At 5.00 for qualification (implied 20%), the market underprices their 52% advancement probability in my model by a significant margin. Ghana’s path to the Round of 32 runs through a win against Panama and a favourable result against a potentially rotated Croatia on the final matchday — a scenario that is entirely plausible and well within the capabilities of a squad built around Premier League talent.
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | England | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 7 |
| 2 | Croatia | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 6 |
| 3 | Ghana | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 4 | Panama | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
England take Group L with seven points — a draw against Croatia on matchday two and comfortable wins in the other two fixtures. Croatia recover from that matchday-two result to beat Ghana and Panama, securing second on six points. Ghana finish third with three points, which likely falls short of the best-third threshold — but if they beat Panama by a wider margin and keep other results close, four points is within reach through an upset against Croatia. For Kiwi punters tracking World Cup 2026 Group L, the England squad profile is worth examining in detail: their depth makes them one of only three teams I rate above 90% for group-stage advancement.